On the previous post, we know that nationalism
itself as an identity of each actor in International Relations. This post will
explain about the East and West views about nationalism. Are they support this
nationalism concept or not? Will the East and West see nationalism as an
identity of their country?
There are two views about
nationalism, which are East and West views. Firstly, we will explain about the
East view. Generally, the East believes or sees that nationalism as a good one.
The East defines nationalism as a sense of love to the homeland even wants to sacrifice
themselves for the sake of the homeland. A love to the homeland that is meant
here by Ernest Renan is a sense of belonging by the public to their country. Countries
that use this concept are Indonesia, Malaysia, and other countries.
Second, is about the West view. The West
sees that nationalism as a bad thing. They assume that the concept of nationalism
leads to the radical activities. Besides that, they assume, with nationalism
the people will suffer because they do not have freedom in civic life. Countries
that use this concept are Germany, Italy, and other countries.
Well, even we see nationalism as a
good things we must pay attention to the application of nationalism in civic
life. Why? Because if applying excessive nationalism, so that nationalism will
become ultra-nationalism, means that extreme nationalism. This ultra-nationalism
will lead into the fascist state, where the interests of the country become the
first and not pay attention to the interests of the people.
In conclusion, nationalism is not
seen as a good one but also the bad too. Each of countries has their own view
about nationalism. The important thing is do not lead a country into an
ultra-nationalism country, because it will make a country become a fascist
country.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar